#61
Posted 13 February 2012 - 03:33 AM
#62
Posted 13 February 2012 - 08:04 AM
#63
Posted 13 February 2012 - 09:40 AM
#64
Posted 13 February 2012 - 10:16 AM
#65
Posted 13 February 2012 - 12:36 PM
ides of march. finally, a good movie! i was thoroughly impressed by the film, and the perfomance ryan gosling gave. i appreciated the points it was trying to make, the characters were great, and i was engrossed. it's interesting though; movies with scenes that are supposed to bother me (i.e. drive) don't usually phase me, and movies that aren't supposed to bother me, do. am i the only one that was disturbed by the ending of ides?
I wouldn't say I was distrubed. But I believe things like that happen daily in real life politics.
#66
Posted 13 February 2012 - 04:47 PM
ides of march. finally, a good movie! i was thoroughly impressed by the film, and the perfomance ryan gosling gave. i appreciated the points it was trying to make, the characters were great, and i was engrossed. it's interesting though; movies with scenes that are supposed to bother me (i.e. drive) don't usually phase me, and movies that aren't supposed to bother me, do. am i the only one that was disturbed by the ending of ides?
I was only disturbed by how one dimensional all the characters were. And by the fact that someone made a movie that had both Paul Giamatti and Philip Seymour Hoffman in it and didn't include a scene of them yelling at each other.
#67
Posted 13 February 2012 - 05:26 PM
am i the only one that was disturbed by the ending of ides?
How do you mean? I mean, it was an intentionally cynical ending. Or are you refering to something else?
And by the fact that someone made a movie that had both Paul Giamatti and Philip Seymour Hoffman in it and didn't include a scene of them yelling at each other.
That was a shame.
#68
Posted 13 February 2012 - 05:32 PM
#69
Posted 13 February 2012 - 05:33 PM
I haven't been so conscious that I was watching people "acting" in quite some time. I expected it to be talky, in fact I was looking forward to it. Viggo Mortenson and Micheal Fassbender with a script by Christopher Hampton? Wonderful!
Except it's not. It's boring.
#70
Posted 13 February 2012 - 05:38 PM
Still, it held my attention for the most part. I wish they had pushed more into the conflict between Jung and Freud's world views rather than concentrate on the trivial arguments and clashes of character.
#71
Posted 13 February 2012 - 05:50 PM
I'm watching There Will Be Blood right now. Decent film but the music is a bit odd, I keep expecting people to get shot or something crazy to happen because of it. Doesn't quite seem to fit.
I, on the other hand, loved the ominous soundtrack. Really complimented Daniel Day Lewis' unnerving performance.
#72
Posted 13 February 2012 - 05:59 PM
It's wall to wall exposition. The closest anyone gets to naturalistic acting is Vincent Cassel and even he's saddled with endless explanations of everything.That movie lacked the usual sense of humor Hampton brings to formal situations. There were stabs at it with the differences between Freud and Jung but the characters were so self-analytical that it became absurd in a completely non-comic way.
Still, it held my attention for the most part. I wish they had pushed more into the conflict between Jung and Freud's world views rather than concentrate on the trivial arguments and clashes of character.
Sometimes ninety minutes (and I checked, it is only and hour and a half) can feel like a much longer time.
#73
Posted 13 February 2012 - 06:04 PM
#74
Posted 13 February 2012 - 06:05 PM
I, on the other hand, loved the ominous soundtrack. Really complimented Daniel Day Lewis' unnerving performance.
The further I get into it the more I'm starting to agree with you now. Threw me off a bit at first since I thought he was a decent man and it was weird how the music would go nuts over nothing.
Now it's making more sense the more sinister his character gets.
It's a very good film. Can't quite put my finger on what makes it great other than Daniel Day Lewis though.
#75
Posted 13 February 2012 - 07:20 PM
It's wall to wall exposition. The closest anyone gets to naturalistic acting is Vincent Cassel and even he's saddled with endless explanations of everything.
well, we are talking about psychoanalysts here.
#76
Posted 13 February 2012 - 08:11 PM
So are they. Endlessly.well, we are talking about psychoanalysts here.
#77
Posted 13 February 2012 - 10:17 PM
Yeah, i thought the soundtrack was great too. I love the fact that it's the only thing you really hear for the first 10 minutes of the movie too.
PTA really puts his signature into his movies with the film score
#78
Posted 13 February 2012 - 11:01 PM
#79
Posted 13 February 2012 - 11:44 PM
Grimm wasn't as bad as I thought it might be, but wasn't as good as I thought it should be.
I've heard it gets better.
#80
Posted 13 February 2012 - 11:59 PM
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: What Are You Watching?
|
site →
MOVIES, GAMES AND TV →
What Is That You Are Watching There? There? No, There!Started by Robert B , 01 May 2013 |
|
|
|
![]()
|
site →
MOVIES, GAMES AND TV →
Big Screen Little ScreenStarted by Steve Sensible , 09 Apr 2013 |
|
|
|
![]()
|
site →
MOVIES, GAMES AND TV →
What Are You Watching?Started by Steve Sensible , 17 Mar 2013 |
|
|
|
![]()
|
site →
MOVIES, GAMES AND TV →
On the telly and down the picturesStarted by garjones , 19 Feb 2013 |
|
|
|
![]()
|
site →
MOVIES, GAMES AND TV →
You're Going to Need Glasses if You Keep Staring at the ScreenStarted by stephanie familiar , 30 Jan 2013 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






Sign In
Create Account
This topic is locked

Back to top
















