i've been looking forward to seeing that. the trailer is intense though.
(edit: it's directed by roman polanski, so i won't be paying to see it)
http://www.deadline.com/2012/02/summit-pushes-warm-bodies-release-date/Summit said today it is moving back the wide release of its zombie pic Warm Bodies from August 10, 2012 to February 1, 2013. The movie stars Nicolas Hoult and Teresa Palmer in a story about an unusual zombie who rescues a girl from some of his cohorts and the pair fall in love. Jonathan Levine wrote the script and directed. The move gets it out of the way of tentpoles The Bourne Legacy and Total Recall, which are set to premiere the week before Warm Bodies‘ original date. The February 1 date had been unclaimed.
But after these two films (eventually) open, they might be!Oof. With that and Jack The Giant Killer, someone clearly isn't confident about Nicholas Hoult as a leading man.
I think it's an incredibly tricky concept to put on screen. Zombies aint sexy, but at least they can be pitiable on some levels.WARM BODIES sounds like all kinds of wrong. Like they are trying to do TWILIGHT with zombies.
(edit: it's directed by roman polanski, so i won't be paying to see it)
(edit: it's directed by roman polanski, so i won't be paying to see it)
I thought by your own admission you don't pay to see anything? Kind of takes the sting out of a boycott!
huh? since when do i not pay to see anything?
Oh, I thought you've copped to streaming what you watch at a few different points. It's neither here nor there, I'm just teasing.
Another unwelcome addition to the current trend of fairy-tale reimaginings; Snow White and the Seven Ninjas...?
Well... if she becomes a zombie it sorta does.I think it's an incredibly tricky concept to put on screen. Zombies aint sexy, but at least they can be pitiable on some levels.
I'm not asking for spoilers but I wonder how closely this follows the emotional ride of the Romeo and Juliet model? I can't really see it ending happily ever after.
Didn't they come up with a cure in 28 Weeks Later?
The rules of what makes a "zombie" are pretty arbitrary, we've moved a long way from the voodoo servants of early films but I would agree that the '28 Days/28 Weeks Later' films feature living people who are in no way "dead" or "un-dead". '28 Weeks' in particular makes it clear that all the "infected" have "died" in the six months since the events of the first film. That's why the UK is now considered safe enough to attempt a re-colonisation.They weren't zombie in 28 Days / Weeks Later. They were infected to the "rage" virus. Also, there's the whole "they could run" thing too (which means not proper zombies).
|
site →
MOVIES, GAMES AND TV →
Classic TrailersStarted by Russell H , 11 May 2013 |
|
|
|
|
site →
MOVIES, GAMES AND TV →
Coming Soon...Started by Steve Sensible , 10 May 2013 |
|
|
|
|
site →
THE PUB →
Poll New Green Land: Feds vs. CO, WA ...Started by Miqque Loveland , 16 Nov 2012 |
|
|
|
|
site →
THE PUB →
Veteran's Day - A Place to Say ThanksStarted by Miqque Loveland , 12 Nov 2012 |
|
|
|
|
site →
MOVIES, GAMES AND TV →
DC Movies and TVStarted by Paul F , 03 Nov 2012 |
|
|
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users