What would you like to see adapted to a movie?
#41
Posted 14 February 2012 - 05:31 PM
#42
Posted 14 February 2012 - 07:37 PM
Paul Greengrass might be great for a Marvel Studios MarvelMan/MiracleMan. I thought his concept work for WATCHMEN more interesting than Snyder's adaptation.
Greengrass would've been great for Watchmen, but I don't think he'd be right for Miracleman. Who would be, though... hm.
#43
Posted 14 February 2012 - 07:56 PM
#44
Posted 14 February 2012 - 08:34 PM
It's a bit weird imagining him doing a superhero movie, but... I could see Miracleman as a Fincher movie.
#45
Posted 14 February 2012 - 09:12 PM
If it was a commercial venture, then Matthew Vaughn would be the best choice, I think. He'd capture the comic book but wouldn't exceed it.
Still, Greengrass is my choice because the way his development work on Watchmen was aiming for something that wouldn't look like a comic book. He'd find a way to make it look like an original film which essentially was the innovation of Miracleman #1 in the first place. It was a superhero title drawn like a drama or science fiction story. Not like superhero comics. If Greengrass directed, I'd like to see Tony Gilroy write the script.
Also, possibly, newcomer Josh Trank (CHRONICLE) with a script by Max Landis (also CHRONICLE)
Neill Blomkamp, of course, or Jonathan Liebesmann even though I've only liked his indy film KILLING ROOM.
Finally, for an outside choice with a big budget - David Yates directing with Steve Kloves writing.
On the way outside - André Øvredal (TROLLHUNTER), Gareth Edwards (MONSTERS) or Richard Kelly (DONNIE DARKO, THE BOX)
#46
Posted 14 February 2012 - 10:09 PM
Finally just accept the fact that it's a $200m indie flick and get on with it.
Outside comics; 'Neuromancer' and the only name (apart from Chris Nolan) I can think of for it is Duncan Jones.
#47
Posted 14 February 2012 - 10:12 PM
If he did do Neuromancer, I think it would closer to an indy A SCANNER DARKLY-style production than THE MATRIX or any big action SF epic.
#48
Posted 14 February 2012 - 10:36 PM
I'm not a fan of his, and I wouldn't be interested in a "small" 'Neuromancer' anyway.Seems like Vincent Natali (CYPHER, SPLICE) has been trying to make Neuromancer for a while (http://www.firstshow...ured-financing/). I heard he was connected to a new Alan Moore-based Swamp Thing back in 2010, but I imagine that never got very far.
If he did do Neuromancer, I think it would closer to an indy A SCANNER DARKLY-style production than THE MATRIX or any big action SF epic.
#49
Posted 14 February 2012 - 11:32 PM
that's what I'd like to see someone adapt into a film. it'd be sort of the anti-Phantom Menace.
#50
Posted 15 February 2012 - 05:12 PM
I'd like to see the Norse Sagas and Egyptian Myths get a serious big budget adaptation as well. Why do the Greeks get all the fun?
#51
Posted 15 February 2012 - 05:39 PM
They tried it as a feature film and then as a mini-series. In both cases there were problems. I'm not sure what they could try next?Yeah, there are plenty of adaptations that have already been made that I'd like to see redone better than they were - DUNE, for example.
I think it's just that western civilization borrowed more from the Greeks (via the Romans) than it did from the Vikings or the Egyptians.I'd like to see the Norse Sagas and Egyptian Myths get a serious big budget adaptation as well. Why do the Greeks get all the fun?
Having said that, we still get 'Mummy' movies and we had 'The Lord of the Rings', which are as influenced by the Norse myths and anything else they draw from.
#52
Posted 15 February 2012 - 05:58 PM
I think a "GAME OF THRONES" or "BATTLESTAR GALLACTICA" style adaptation as a long term series would not be a bad idea, but I don't think the problem with the film and mini-series were inherent to the media, but instead the productions were flawed. Neither one figured out how to present the story in a way that would invite the audience into it, unlike GAME OF THRONES where it captures the very vivid world and story of the novel.They tried it as a feature film and then as a mini-series. In both cases there were problems. I'm not sure what they could try next?
I'm surprised we don't see more Norse sagas adapted from Northern Europe, actually. Maybe the stigma of Nazism and Hitler's appropriation of the myths via Wagner's opera works has left people less enamored of them. How well did Marvel's THOR with its Aryan lead do in Scandinavia?
Speaking of DUNE, I hadn't noticed it before, but I wonder if Zecharia Sitchin ever read it, because the conflicts between Enki, Enlil and Marduk certainly resemble the Atriedes versus the Harkonnens. On top of that, the basic idea, extra-worldly colonials coming down to a desert to rob a planet of its resources, matches both The Earth Chronicles and Dune. They ruled as "gods" and Paul pretended to be/became their Messiah returned - the Mahdi (Muab-di'b).
#53
Posted 15 February 2012 - 06:56 PM
So, do it again, but better?I think a "GAME OF THRONES" or "BATTLESTAR GALLACTICA" style adaptation as a long term series would not be a bad idea, but I don't think the problem with the film and mini-series were inherent to the media, but instead the productions were flawed. Neither one figured out how to present the story in a way that would invite the audience into it, unlike GAME OF THRONES where it captures the very vivid world and story of the novel.
I'm sure we will see 'Dune' adapted again, but it'll still be pot luck whether it works or not.
I don't think it's even a concern is it? Despite the neo-Nazis who complained about a black Asgardian in 'Thor' no-one else really cares what the ethnicity of a legend is? There are limits in terms of trying not to produce something distracting, but I think Ken Watanabe would make an awesome viking for example.I'm surprised we don't see more Norse sagas adapted from Northern Europe, actually. Maybe the stigma of Nazism and Hitler's appropriation of the myths via Wagner's opera works has left people less enamored of them. How well did Marvel's THOR with its Aryan lead do in Scandinavia?
Apart from 'Thor' though, have any viking-themed films done well since Kirk Douglas and Tony Curtis jumped on a longship?
'13th Warrior', 'Pathfinder', 'Outlander' and even 'Beowulf'? I'm sure there are people who made money off them but even Zemeckis' film wasn't a runaway hit.
We hear about viking films in development from time to time, but most of them stay there.
#54
Posted 15 February 2012 - 07:00 PM
Directed by Michael Bay.
#55
Posted 15 February 2012 - 07:04 PM
Apart from 'Thor' though, have any viking-themed films done well since Kirk Douglas and Tony Curtis jumped on a longship?
'13th Warrior', 'Pathfinder', 'Outlander' and even 'Beowulf'? I'm sure there are people who made money off them but even Zemeckis' film wasn't a runaway hit.
We hear about viking films in development from time to time, but most of them stay there.

Total Lifetime Grosses
Domestic: $217,581,231 44.0%
+ Foreign: $277,297,528 56.0%
= Worldwide: $494,878,759
#56
Posted 15 February 2012 - 07:24 PM
I'm surprised we don't see more Norse sagas adapted from Northern Europe, actually. Maybe the stigma of Nazism and Hitler's appropriation of the myths via Wagner's opera works has left people less enamored of them. How well did Marvel's THOR with its Aryan lead do in Scandinavia?
I can only answer anecdotally but whenever this topic comes up among the Norwegian side of my family and friends it turns out that while people do take a vague folkloristic pride in their Norse (and Viking) heritage there seems to be comparably little serious interest in the pre-Christianization history as opposed to the middle ages and the period of Norway’s declaration of independence which resulted in the country’s eventual dissolution from Sweden.
That said I know quite a few people who still hold a grudge for the rather bloody Christianization of Norway and consider themselves pagans, but not a single one of them is a neo-Nazi and all of them enjoyed Thor for what it was – black Heimdall included.
#57
Posted 15 February 2012 - 07:41 PM
And an excellent film it is too.
Total Lifetime GrossesDomestic: $217,581,231 44.0%
+ Foreign: $277,297,528 56.0%
= Worldwide: $494,878,759
A couple more and we might see a trend!
#58
Posted 15 February 2012 - 10:36 PM
#59
Posted 16 February 2012 - 09:47 AM
They tried it as a feature film and then as a mini-series. In both cases there were problems. I'm not sure what they could try next?
David Lynch's film wasn't really an adaptation, it was a "I want to use these concepts and then do my own thing" film. Someone taking the "Peter Jackson" approach could make a very good trilogy out of the first book.
I haven't seen the mini-series but I thought it was generally well regarded?
I'm surprised we don't see more Norse sagas adapted from Northern Europe, actually. Maybe the stigma of Nazism and Hitler's appropriation of the myths via Wagner's opera works has left people less enamored of them. How well did Marvel's THOR with its Aryan lead do in Scandinavia?
But Wagner's "adaptations" are some of the most revered and successful works in classical music, with a lot of people enamoured of them (including in Scandinavia, where they are regularly performed).
And yes, people still talk about the Aryan stigma attached the the operas, but that doesn't stop people flocking to them. And didn't stop Daniel Barenboim becoming one of the top-regarded Wagnerian conductors, as well as being the most prominent Jewish conductors of our time!
#60
Posted 16 February 2012 - 06:26 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






Sign In
Create Account
Back to top
















