TV News Thread
#1
Posted 19 January 2012 - 12:01 AM
#2
Posted 19 January 2012 - 07:01 PM
#3
Posted 20 January 2012 - 09:19 AM
Hm. Can't say I'm all that surprised. It was always going to be a tough show to get right.
You mean because every episode would have been 42 minutes of talking heads followed by one very minor plot advancement, with every character having exactly the same personality and mode of speech?
(Disclaimer: I have never read Powers. I just don't have high expecations from the man who turned me off The Avengers after 30 years of faithful reading.)
#4
Posted 20 January 2012 - 09:30 AM
#5
Posted 20 January 2012 - 09:36 AM
Hm. Can't say I'm all that surprised. It was always going to be a tough show to get right.
Yes my thoughts too.
Let's be honest there's hardly a great pedigree of superhero shows on TV anyway. I think of those made that aren't cartoons only Misfits has been good.
#6
Posted 20 January 2012 - 12:34 PM
Let's be honest there's hardly a great pedigree of superhero shows on TV anyway. I think of those made that aren't cartoons only Misfits has been good.
I disagree. Heroes had one unbelieveably good season. No Ordinary Family was fun, if a bit lightweight. Alphas became my favourite show on TV for a brief while last year.
I shall gloss over The Cape...
#7
Posted 20 January 2012 - 12:38 PM
I disagree. Heroes had one unbelieveably good season. No Ordinary Family was fun, if a bit lightweight. Alphas became my favourite show on TV for a brief while last year.
I shall gloss over The Cape...
Heroes has some great episodes in that first series but it did end on a damp squib, after that is complete nonsense. The others I haven't seen but didn't hear much of note about them. So I'll stick to my statement of only Misfits being good, on balance Heroes was average, it could have been good if they hadn't screwed it up.
Was "No Ordinary Family' as good as "My Hero"?
#8
Posted 20 January 2012 - 12:45 PM
Was "No Ordinary Family' as good as "My Hero"?
It had Michael Chilkis and Darla from Buffy in it. that's all you need to know
#9
Posted 20 January 2012 - 01:13 PM
We’ll Take Manhattan explores the explosive love affair between Sixties supermodel, Jean Shrimpton, and photographer, David Bailey.
Focusing on a wild and unpredictable 1962 Vogue photo shoot in New York, the drama brings to life the story of two young people falling in love, misbehaving and inadvertently defining the style of the Sixties along the way.
Set predominantly in 1962 but also exploring the story of how Bailey and Shrimpton first met, this one-off drama reveals how a young, visionary photographer refused to conform. He insisted on using the unconventional model Jean Shrimpton on an important photo shoot for British Vogue and, over the course of a freezing week in Manhattan, went against the wishes of fashion editor, Lady Clare Rendlesham, and made startling, original photographs.
We’ll Take Manhattan is the story of that wild week, of Bailey and Jean’s love affair, and of how two young people accidentally changed the world for ever.
(click the pics to embiggen)
#10
Posted 20 January 2012 - 01:52 PM
#11
Posted 26 January 2012 - 04:01 AM
#12
Posted 26 January 2012 - 05:26 AM
NBC Developing "Office" spin-off, featuring Dwight....
NO.
http://insidetv.ew.c...r-rainn-wilson/
Yep, no thanks. That show only really worked because of the entire ensamble. And Dwight definitely only worked because of the way he interacted with all the other characters on that show (namely Michael, Jim, and Andy). It's time to just let the Office go, NBC. It had a great run, but it's time to move on.
#13
Posted 26 January 2012 - 02:14 PM
#14
Posted 26 January 2012 - 02:44 PM
#15
Posted 26 January 2012 - 02:50 PM
Dwight's been far too much of a cartoon for the last few years. I don't know how you could build a show around him on his farm that's in any way relatable.
Maybe leave the office enviroment entirely - set it on his farm, along with that yokel cousin of his, include a relatable couple of characters (a 'will they/won't they' couple) along with a bad guy that makes Dwight more relatable - that's about the way these things usual go.
Or just go the Eastbound & Down route where the main character is a massive asshole but he's compeling enough to watch.
#16
Posted 26 January 2012 - 03:16 PM
Maybe leave the office enviroment entirely - set it on his farm, along with that yokel cousin of his, include a relatable couple of characters (a 'will they/won't they' couple) along with a bad guy that makes Dwight more relatable - that's about the way these things usual go.
Or just go the Eastbound & Down route where the main character is a massive asshole but he's compeling enough to watch.
Cousin Mose is played by Mike Schur, the head writer on Parks and Recreation, so there's no chance of getting him.
I don't think something like Eastbound & Down would work on network TV.
#17
Posted 26 January 2012 - 05:04 PM
The Incredible Hulk ran for 5 years.Yes my thoughts too.
Let's be honest there's hardly a great pedigree of superhero shows on TV anyway. I think of those made that aren't cartoons only Misfits has been good.
#18
Posted 26 January 2012 - 05:21 PM
The Incredible Hulk ran for 5 years.
I wouldn't really call that a superhero show though.
#19
Posted 26 January 2012 - 05:21 PM
They could give him a radio show and a pretentious brother? ../../..//public/style_emoticons/default/wink.png
How about have him move to Hollywood to become an actor.
#20
Posted 26 January 2012 - 07:02 PM
I wouldn't really call that a superhero show though.
Yeah, it was more the dramatic adventures of a hitchhiker.
Cousin Mose is played by Mike Schur, the head writer on Parks and Recreation, so there's no chance of getting him.
Ah, multi-talented chap (I'm guessing - I've only seen one ep of P&R)
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






Sign In
Create Account
This topic is locked

Back to top















