#161
Posted 20 January 2012 - 12:51 AM
#162
Posted 20 January 2012 - 12:54 AM
#163
Posted 20 January 2012 - 03:49 AM
I believe they're choosing to end it. Though, as of the end of season 4, Gilligan and the writers hadn't concretely planned how it would wrap up. I'm sure that's changed by now, though.
Gilligan has said that the show is ending on his terms
#164
Posted 20 January 2012 - 04:28 AM
#165
Posted 20 January 2012 - 05:53 AM
Tonight I became perhaps the only person on the planet to watch Irreversible a second time.
Good God, WHY?!
I mean, I know why, I've thought about going back and watching it again... but I've never had the fortitude to do it.
#166
Posted 20 January 2012 - 05:55 AM
#167
Posted 20 January 2012 - 02:39 PM
Good God, WHY?!
I mean, I know why, I've thought about going back and watching it again... but I've never had the fortitude to do it.
Shock value stuff doesn't always work on me, and I like movies that are sadistic (though I don't know if this one is).
It's actually a fairly tedious movie, all things considered, but I do find the whole more interesting than the sum of its parts.
#168
Posted 20 January 2012 - 06:38 PM
Have you guys seen Enter the Void?
I've heard mixed reviews. It seemed a little boring, but, then again, so do many Wong Kar-wai movies.
#169
Posted 20 January 2012 - 11:21 PM
But.... this episode is set in London.
I'll stick with it for now.
#170
Posted 20 January 2012 - 11:56 PM
#171
Posted 21 January 2012 - 12:50 AM
#172
Posted 21 January 2012 - 01:08 AM
Shock value stuff doesn't always work on me, and I like movies that are sadistic (though I don't know if this one is).
It's actually a fairly tedious movie, all things considered, but I do find the whole more interesting than the sum of its parts.
I agree. I remember finding it much more interesting after it was done than I did when I was actually watching it.
#173
Posted 21 January 2012 - 01:36 AM
I've heard mixed reviews. It seemed a little boring, but, then again, so do many Wong Kar-wai movies.
It's very slow but I was absorbed by it once it becomes the movie that it wants to be, maybe a half hour in.
#174
Posted 21 January 2012 - 09:32 AM
#175
Posted 21 January 2012 - 10:17 AM
In South Park, the anti-semitism comes from the despicable, damaged character and is clearly meant to be frowned on (just like it was with Archie Bunker).
There's an episode where Cartman's picking on ginger kids, so Kyle dyes Cartman's hair ginger while he sleeps so he can learn what it's like. Cartman's response is to turn into a ginger Hitler and rabble-rouse all the gingers into a pogrom against everyone else. He doesn't hate anyone because they're black or Jewish or anything else; he hates them because they're not like him.
#176
Posted 21 January 2012 - 11:21 AM
http://timemachinego...12/01/21/shame/
Definitely my movie of the year (I include a top 10 at the end).
#177
Posted 21 January 2012 - 11:25 AM
It's nice to see a modern horror movie that offers up something a bit different to the same old stalk and slash, the characters are a bit more rounded than the usual horror fodder and the gore is used sparingly but effectively.
#178
Posted 21 January 2012 - 12:08 PM
The film didn't really work for me. It was a good idea but the characters never actually engaged me at all.The Ruins - A bunch of young Americans are lured into a Mexican jungle by a somewhat sinister German and end up encountering something nasty.
It's nice to see a modern horror movie that offers up something a bit different to the same old stalk and slash, the characters are a bit more rounded than the usual horror fodder and the gore is used sparingly but effectively.Spoiler
It's one of those films I might give another try one day, just to see if I was in a bad mood when I tried to watch it.
This morning is lazy and I'm watching the rain clouds come and go. The TV is entertaining me with some good history programmes; Neil Oliver's 'History of Scotland' Robert Bartlett's 'The Normans'.
'The Normans' is a very well made show, but Oliver's series is really excellent. He's a good presenter anyway, but this brought out his best work by far.
#179
Posted 21 January 2012 - 01:12 PM
#180
Posted 21 January 2012 - 01:19 PM
Didn't realise it was based on Philip K Dick until I saw the credit at the end. One I've never read... I can see it's his kind of idea, but I assume it's very loosely based, as usual with these things (Jonny Henning nee California will hopefully pop in and tell me).
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: What Are You Watching?
|
site →
MOVIES, GAMES AND TV →
What Is That You Are Watching There? There? No, There!Started by Robert B , 01 May 2013 |
|
|
|
![]()
|
site →
MOVIES, GAMES AND TV →
Big Screen Little ScreenStarted by Steve Sensible , 09 Apr 2013 |
|
|
|
![]()
|
site →
MOVIES, GAMES AND TV →
What Are You Watching?Started by Steve Sensible , 17 Mar 2013 |
|
|
|
![]()
|
site →
MOVIES, GAMES AND TV →
On the telly and down the picturesStarted by garjones , 19 Feb 2013 |
|
|
|
![]()
|
site →
MOVIES, GAMES AND TV →
You're Going to Need Glasses if You Keep Staring at the ScreenStarted by stephanie familiar , 30 Jan 2013 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






Sign In
Create Account
This topic is locked
Back to top

















