SPOILERSYouri, I think the weight of expectation may crush The Dark Knight Rises (just like Prometheus was deemed a failure by some due to it's ties to the far superior Alien) . It's a good film (with some pretty major plot holes and flaws) but the perception that this is going to equal The Dark Knight isn't going to do it any favours.
Bale, Caine (especially) and Hathaway are all good, Tom Hardy is hindered by the mask in his performance but does get one very effective scene towards the end where he overcomes that (it's just that Bane himself never seems a really viable threat, it's just that the plot dictates he is). Every one else is okay.
Plot-wise it's not so great. Logic goes out the window on more than one occasion and some of the stuff Nolan tries to pull off just doesn't ring true. An awful lot of scenes in the movie just seem to sit next to each other, rather than flowing from one into the other. For a long movie it sometimes felt like some of the "connective tissue" of the film was missing.
We see so little of Gotham's ordinary citizens that we barely feel for their plight, and therefore don't invest in their rescue. And after 5 months of rule by a "warlord" who has released 1000's of the cities worst criminals Gotham looks...no different than it did before hand...except now it's snowing.
Are Bane's henchmen all League assassins (in which case they're a bit crap) or are they just mercenaries (in which case why do they follow him so devotedly/religiously?). What do they get out of all this? They don't come across as religious fanatics, but they also don't seem to be only about the money/loot. Even after taking over the city and pillaging it they dress like tramps who shop at army surplus.
A nuclear bomb? Really? I'm so over nuclear bombs as the ultimate threat. Just doesn't feel very "Batman" to me.
I may have to watch Batman Begins again but I'm not quite sure why Rha's Al Ghul (and all his followers) have such a hate on for Gotham. Especially since it's now cleaned up and crime free. Okay the fat cats live there, but they are pretty much everywhere. Why not hit London or Paris or Tokyo? If it's to break Bruce Wayne/Batman's spirit that's a pretty convoluted way to go about it?!?! The guy is pretty much a broken shut in when the movie begins, why draw him out of retirement just to break him again?
Bane's men would have massacred the police at the climax of the film. Automatic rifles and Tumblers against batons and pistols? Fighting (very clean and well groomed) guys hand-to-hand who have lived underground for 5 months (even if they have had food and water, and why was that provided again?) shouldn't be a problem for them either.
And some of the "action" in this part really didn't work for me. I'm not expecting gallons of gore and ultra-violence but this was the most bloodless, clean street battle to the death I've ever seen. In fact I thought Nolan's direction of the action in The Dark Knight was all round better than in this movie. This one just seemed a lot cleaner and safer, less risky, dirty and "real" than the previous movie.
This probably all sounds very negative but I don't hate the movie, and weirdly I feel like it's a good sequel to Batman Begins, it's just not a great follow up to the masterpiece of The Dark Knight. Tonally, thematically and story-wise it's way more "comic book-y" than that film and I guess that made me disconnect on more than one occasion. Couldn't suspend disbelief on so many different instances.
For a movie that has heavy elements of The Dark Knight Returns, Knightfall and Batman: The Cult embedded in it's DNA, and follows on from the absolute best super-hero movie ever made, I just feel it never reaches it's full potential.
Edited by Blank Ed Boy, 19 July 2012 - 10:34 AM.