#1
Posted 03 April 2012 - 01:47 PM
PS- Off to watch last weeks episode so I know what you all are talking about.
#2
Posted 03 April 2012 - 07:48 PM
I really like the additions of Michael Ginsberg and Dawn, especially since what a lot of us think of as the '60s is really starting to kick off and intrude into the SCDP world. I think Michael is going to be a fantastic addition to the office: the young unconventional man who is completey different from Don yet idolizes him.
I also like the work relationship that's developed between Peggy and the artist guy whose name I never remember. They've got a real brother-sister thing that the characters have grown into.
The best bits of the first three hours though? Roger really beginning to feel his age and Harry getting stoned and housing 20 White Castles.
#3
Posted 03 April 2012 - 10:42 PM
The scene at the new employee's home was odd. Have we ever followed one of the non-main characters away from the office before? I can't even recall scenes of Ken or Harry alone without one of the other regulars.
#4
Posted 04 April 2012 - 01:11 AM
You're all right..Fat Suit Betty is so disturbing to look at..at times I felt like I was looking at that mutated senator from the first Xmen movie as be slowly becomes gelatinous.
It's interesting to see how in the early seasons, Draper was kind of a legend among the middle aged ad men, but now he's almost revered by the counter culture youth of the 60's.
#5
Posted 04 April 2012 - 10:56 AM
#6
Posted 09 April 2012 - 01:13 PM
#7
Posted 09 April 2012 - 01:23 PM
Anyone watch last night? Sally was great as usual, but Peggy was on FIRE!
the
i found people's reactions to the chicago massacre pretty odd, particularly when betty's mother-in-law was describing it to sally. props to the new guy for telling them off.
edit: the scene where don
#8
Posted 09 April 2012 - 02:56 PM
Spoiler
I think they are trying to get us to believe that
the scene where don
Spoiler
Interesting how Don has come clean to Megan about
You know who I miss? Sal! I hope they can find a way to work in a cameo later on.
#9
Posted 09 April 2012 - 03:00 PM
I think they are trying to get us to believe that
SpoilerSpoiler
Interesting how Don has come clean to Megan aboutSpoiler
You know who I miss? Sal! I hope they can find a way to work in a cameo later on.
i loved sal, i really did. he was one of my favourite characters, and i always liked scenes where he was with his wife in their apartment. i'm fairly certain that the creator of the show said sal would never be back though.
#10
Posted 09 April 2012 - 03:07 PM
i loved sal, i really did. he was one of my favourite characters, and i always liked scenes where he was with his wife in their apartment. i'm fairly certain that the creator of the show said sal would never be back though.
That sucks. I aalways saw him as a tragic figure, not only becauese he couldn't out himself,. but becaue he was fired for showing a bit of integrity. While guys like Harry keep their jobs while being complete asses.
#11
Posted 09 April 2012 - 03:19 PM
That sucks. I aalways saw him as a tragic figure, not only becauese he couldn't out himself,. but becaue he was fired for showing a bit of integrity. While guys like Harry keep their jobs while being complete asses.
i agree, i don't see why he had to be fired. and i dislike harry very much. given the era, it's kind of hard being a chick and watching that show.
#12
Posted 09 April 2012 - 03:29 PM
Sal was fired because Lee Garner Jr. would have pulled all of Lucky Strike's business from British Sterling Cooper, which would have made them fold the company sooner than they did.i agree, i don't see why he had to be fired. and i dislike harry very much. given the era, it's kind of hard being a chick and watching that show.
Harry started out as kind of sympathetic -- he felt guilty about sleeping with Pete's then-secretary and told his wife, with hilarious results -- now he's just annoying -- thinking that his Hollywood connnexions will get him some tail.
#13
Posted 09 April 2012 - 06:47 PM
#14
Posted 09 April 2012 - 08:44 PM
Sal was fired because Lee Garner Jr. would have pulled all of Lucky Strike's business from British Sterling Cooper, which would have made them fold the company sooner than they did.
well when you put it that way. but why couldn't he have been hired back when they lost lucky strike?
I always enjoy how completely meaningless the previews for the next episodes of Mad Men are.
#15
Posted 09 April 2012 - 08:55 PM
well when you put it that way. but why couldn't he have been hired back when they lost lucky strike?
Maybe he is doing something else. The way Don fired him made me think he wouldn't want him back though.
Interesting that everyone wants Sal back but no one wants awful Paul Kinsey back.
#16
Posted 09 April 2012 - 09:03 PM
Interesting that everyone wants Sal back but no one wants awful Paul Kinsey back.
i actually liked kinsey, he seemed like less of a louse than the others, but i had completely forgotten about him until you mentioned his name.
#17
Posted 09 April 2012 - 09:12 PM
i actually liked kinsey
#18
Posted 09 April 2012 - 11:57 PM
well when you put it that way. but why couldn't he have been hired back when they lost lucky strike?
Maybe he is doing something else. The way Don fired him made me think he wouldn't want him back though.
Would either of YOU go back if you were treated like Sal?
SCDP had massive layoffs after losing Lucky Strike, so they couldn't get Sal back... and Don was pissed at Sal because he knew Sal was gay and expected him to whore himself out, like Don did with that Utz schmuck's wife.
Kinsey was a damn hippie.
#19
Posted 10 April 2012 - 01:25 PM
It's amusing that SCDP are being forced into the current climate and diversifying - mainly due to that lame joke ad backfiring.
I like the Pete/Roger rivalry building up - like a WASPy version of Christopher/Paulie Walnuts from the Sopranos.
#20
Posted 10 April 2012 - 02:01 PM
I like the Pete/Roger rivalry building up - like a WASPy version of Christopher/Paulie Walnuts from the Sopranos.
Love that very apt comparison. I think it's a great twist for Roger to be the one fighting to prove his relevance to the firm while Pete is making his bones by being competent, not a smarmy little pissant trying to worm his way into his superiors' good graces.
Fun fact about Pete: his mom's family is descended from the Dyckmans, some of the oldest Dutch settlers in Manhattan. They owned most of the land in upper Manhattan, where I grew up. Their family farmhouse is still preserved there.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






Sign In
Create Account

Back to top















