Doctor Who: Companions in Arms
#21
Posted 23 March 2012 - 10:43 PM
The programme's strong enough again that it can cope with playing against the audience's expectations a bit every now and then. The Doctor Who concept is far greater, and more encompassing, than just alien-of-the-week.
#22
Posted 23 March 2012 - 11:58 PM
#23
Posted 24 March 2012 - 12:37 AM
#24
Posted 24 March 2012 - 05:41 AM
Yeah, I still feel that The Van Gogh would have worked even better without the alien.
It's still a cool idea, though; that the Doctor spots something alien in one of Van Gogh's paintings and then goes back to investigate.
#25
Posted 24 March 2012 - 10:51 AM
#26
Posted 24 March 2012 - 11:31 AM
'Torchwood' did something like that (minus the time travel). It didn't work, but it was 'Torchwood' so that's not a definitive argument against the idea itself.They could do a story where the Doctor goes back to some random time period and finds something strange going on that he thinks is down to aliens/monsters but it turns out isn't.
#27
Posted 24 March 2012 - 02:47 PM
#28
Posted 24 March 2012 - 03:13 PM
I haven't watched Black Orchid for a couple of years, but I don't think it really has a mystery as to whether aliens/monsters are involved. It doesn't really have a mystery in it, which is bad for a mystery story.Black Orchid, one of the Peter Davison stories did it, it was pretty well regarded if I recall.
#29
Posted 24 March 2012 - 03:44 PM
I haven't watched Black Orchid for a couple of years, but I don't think it really has a mystery as to whether aliens/monsters are involved. It doesn't really have a mystery in it, which is bad for a mystery story.
I haven't seen it for a lot longer but I thought there was the mysterious disfigured character lurking around.
#30
Posted 24 March 2012 - 03:51 PM
'Black Orchid' completely slipped my mind, and possibly because the "mystery" is so obvious.I haven't watched Black Orchid for a couple of years, but I don't think it really has a mystery as to whether aliens/monsters are involved. It doesn't really have a mystery in it, which is bad for a mystery story.
I Wiki'd the story and found this;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Orchid_(Doctor_Who)#ProductionIn the DVD commentary, Peter Davison and Janet Fielding revealed that Black Orchid is not a particular favourite episode of theirs, because they disliked the lack of a science fiction element and thought the script was generally trite.
Not mysterious enough though.I haven't seen it for a lot longer but I thought there was the mysterious disfigured character lurking around.
#31
Posted 24 March 2012 - 04:06 PM
Regardless, I do think it could work with just a historical episode, as long as the script is strong and exciting. They've done episodes where the Doctor barely appears and I'd think that's a greater risk that one without a space monster.
#32
Posted 24 March 2012 - 06:21 PM
Other news: The Ponds last episode will be shot in New York and the current TARDIS set has been replaced by a new one already.
#33
Posted 24 March 2012 - 07:13 PM
#34
Posted 24 March 2012 - 07:14 PM
#35
Posted 24 March 2012 - 08:53 PM
I'd heard Moffatt quoted from the press thing through the week thatOn topic: Is that a
Spoilerat the very end?
#36
Posted 24 March 2012 - 09:05 PM
#37
Posted 24 March 2012 - 09:53 PM
And as for
#38
Posted 25 March 2012 - 12:52 AM
#39
Posted 25 March 2012 - 09:49 AM
When they return in Flesh and Stone, there are definitely scenes in which we see them move when no-one in the show is watching them. It ruined the effect somewhat, I thought.so, got up to Blink in my Who rewatch. Has it ever been raised on whether the Weeping Angels can move when we are watching them?
#40
Posted 25 March 2012 - 10:27 AM
On topic: Is that a
Spoilerat the very end?
Definitely. Note that the Doctor says
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






Sign In
Create Account
This topic is locked
Back to top
















