I'm going to take that comment seriously and run with it, if you don't mind? Because you're not really wrong but...
'QoS' was bloody annoying. It followed a really good Bond film and just wasn't good. Not "as" good, simply "not good".
However it did manage to to be more coherent and better staged than 'Hitman', obviously it cost a lot more but that really shouldn't matter. 'Hitman' had enough money to achieve its goals but it failed.
That's one way of looking at it. Another is to say that both films were equally bad in their own differing ways - Hitman was stupid, QoB was boring - but at least there were a few seconds of interest in Hitman because Olga Kurylenko did frontal nudity.