#41
Posted 04 March 2012 - 07:34 AM
#42
Posted 04 March 2012 - 08:39 AM
it was. did you read the book, by any chance?
I have. It was a nasty, cruel little piece of work. Very good.
#43
Posted 04 March 2012 - 01:21 PM
I can't say I really liked Revolutionary Road, but it was very well acted (and well made all around, just not a movie I was necessarily in the mood for at the time). Kate Winslet should have won the Oscar that year for that movie instead of The Reader (if she indeed needed to win that year...I still think she should have won for Eternal Sunshine), and I felt that Leo deserved at least a nomination. Those two really made the movie work.
don't even get me started on the brilliance of Eternal Sunshine, chris.
kate and leo really did make the movie work, movies like that and Blue Valentine that are about the decay of a relationship between two people rely almost entirely upon the two leads. without their ability to make us believe in their relationship, both in the good times and bad, the movie is nothing. i wish i could think of a similar movie that had two leads that had no chemistry or believability... the only one i can think of, which isn't even really the same type of film, is The Vow.
I have. It was a nasty, cruel little piece of work. Very good.
it was, on both remarks. it had a lot to say about america in the 50's, relationships, women's rights... interesting read.
#44
Posted 04 March 2012 - 01:25 PM
Revolutionary Road is a difficult one for me - whilst (as you say) it was really well-shot, directed, acted and so on, the nature of the story means I didn't come away from it feeling as though I loved the film, or even ever wanted to see it again. I think it achieved its goals perfectly, but I don't think that providing an entertaining or particularly enjoyable-to-watch film was one of them.I can't say I really liked Revolutionary Road, but it was very well acted (and well made all around, just not a movie I was necessarily in the mood for at the time). Kate Winslet should have won the Oscar that year for that movie instead of The Reader (if she indeed needed to win that year...I still think she should have won for Eternal Sunshine), and I felt that Leo deserved at least a nomination. Those two really made the movie work.
Oh go on, get started. I love it too. In fact, I'm long overdue another rewatch.don't even get me started on the brilliance of Eternal Sunshine, chris.
#45
Posted 04 March 2012 - 02:25 PM
it was. did you read the book, by any chance?
I did, and thought the book was pretty good, albeit an uncomfortable read.
I agree with the above poster who said it had a lot to say about the 50's, womens rights, etc.
I was going through a divorce at the time I read the book and saw the movie, and the arguments felt a little too real to me..but that said, the movie made me FEEL something, whether it be good or discomfort. The two leads were pitch perfect, and Michael Shannon's character added a nice bit of flash to further discomfort things.
#46
Posted 04 March 2012 - 02:38 PM
'F' : A low-budget British horror movie about a bunch of hoodie-wearing youths descending on a school late one evening and terrorising the staff and pupils within. The story isn't particularly strong, but the way it's shot and the way the bad-guys are treated (faces constantly hidden, silently crawling around on top of furniture, lockers etc. so they seem more like Aliens than kids) is nicely done and lends the whole thing a supernatural air.
Unfortunately it got to about 10 minutes from the end and I wondered how they were going to tie things up in a satisfying way in so short a time. Answer? They don't.
#47
Posted 04 March 2012 - 02:40 PM
#48
Posted 04 March 2012 - 02:43 PM
#49
Posted 04 March 2012 - 02:47 PM
#50
Posted 04 March 2012 - 02:51 PM
I'm sure it's completely different story wise but the thing the trailer instantly made me think of was the Cradlegrave story from 2000AD a few years ago:
#51
Posted 04 March 2012 - 02:56 PM
#52
Posted 04 March 2012 - 06:06 PM
#53
Posted 04 March 2012 - 06:32 PM
Heh.
#54
Posted 04 March 2012 - 06:49 PM
#55
Posted 04 March 2012 - 06:51 PM
Highlights are talked about here: http://www.hitfix.co...renewal-chances
#56
Posted 04 March 2012 - 10:45 PM
Also finally watched the final episode of Sherlock, which generally worked for me. It moved along quick enough that I was able to overlook most of the problems. I have no idea what the solution to the ending is, though it clearly has to do with Sherlock asking Molly for help, forcing Watson to stay in one specific spot while he jumped and then Watson getting knocked down. Sherlocks comment about a magic trick makes it clear that there was a slight of hand involved.
Edited by Rory Abel, 04 March 2012 - 10:46 PM.
#57
Posted 05 March 2012 - 01:02 AM
#58
Posted 05 March 2012 - 01:07 AM
#59
Posted 05 March 2012 - 03:22 AM
I watched the Girl with the Dragon Tattoo last night (the original version). I don't get what all the fuss is about - I thought it was a regular murder mystery with shock thrown in for the sake of it.
Yeah I thought the rape was pretty gratitious (and didn't need to be shown since they recap it once she watches the recording). Plus I found it pretty creepy that the stand-in for the author ends up sleeping with girl who's, what, 18? I think it's interest lies in that it upends the normal format and the hero falls into what is usually the female role while the female character ends up being the kickass hero. But overall, I didn't get what the big deal was.
#60
Posted 05 March 2012 - 04:53 AM
Yeah I thought the rape was pretty gratitious (and didn't need to be shown since they recap it once she watches the recording). Plus I found it pretty creepy that the stand-in for the author ends up sleeping with girl who's, what, 18? I think it's interest lies in that it upends the normal format and the hero falls into what is usually the female role while the female character ends up being the kickass hero. But overall, I didn't get what the big deal was.
I read the books and saw the US version of the movie. I thought they were solid for what they were, but I admit I was also surprised that it was so popular a thing. Although Lisbeth is, I think, 24 when the whole things start. Not 18. Still significantly younger than Blomkvist, but I didn't find anything creepy about it.
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: What Are You Watching?
|
site →
MOVIES, GAMES AND TV →
What Is That You Are Watching There? There? No, There!Started by Robert B , 01 May 2013 |
|
|
|
![]()
|
site →
MOVIES, GAMES AND TV →
Big Screen Little ScreenStarted by Steve Sensible , 09 Apr 2013 |
|
|
|
![]()
|
site →
MOVIES, GAMES AND TV →
What Are You Watching?Started by Steve Sensible , 17 Mar 2013 |
|
|
|
![]()
|
site →
MOVIES, GAMES AND TV →
On the telly and down the picturesStarted by garjones , 19 Feb 2013 |
|
|
|
![]()
|
site →
MOVIES, GAMES AND TV →
You're Going to Need Glasses if You Keep Staring at the ScreenStarted by stephanie familiar , 30 Jan 2013 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






Sign In
Create Account
This topic is locked

Back to top
















